Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bob, I am in complete agreement with your assessment of the issue. I have used the M series since 1957 and sold off the M-6 after comparing it with the old faithfuls, ie., the M-3's. Don Rorschach - ----- Original Message ----- From: "BOB KRAMER" <BobKramer@COOPERCARRY.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:39 PM Subject: RE: [Leica] M Durability > B.D., How do you really *know* that the M3 is less reliable than the M6? > Unless you can offer some type validation for this view, I imagine this is > more of a guess on your part then actual knowledge. If we were talking > automobiles, I would agree with you, but a camera doesn't have near the > moving parts or wear and tear that a car does. > > So pick your poison, I say. An older but better built camera, or a newer > camera without the classic build quality. One thing is for sure. One would > be smart to carry two bodies regardless of the manufacture date if you are > on a paid assignment. > > BTW, the mirror separation is a gradual condition that happens over many > years. Its not like the prism falls out of the camera or anything. > > BK > > -----Original Message----- > From: B. D. Colen [mailto:bdcolen@earthlink.net] > Subject: RE: [Leica] M Durability > > > More power to you, Mark - But old cameras do die, just like old cars die, > old home appliances die, and old people die - no matter how well they're > maintained. In the case of Ms, the finders go belly up - and, if one > believes Sherry Krauter, cannot be reliably repaired when they do (although > they can be replaced with a more modern rangefinder) - and the shutter > curtain roller mechanism goes. > > But again, its a matter of what you're personally comfortable with. I > certainly know that when I'm on a job something can go wrong with one of my > M6s, but I know that that is less likely to happen if I am using a > relatively new M6 than it is if I am using an M3 from 1954 - it's just a sad > fact of life. > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html