Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Provia 100F or K64? (was: Re: [Leica] Film survey.)
From: "Ted Bayer" <tedbayer@harbornet.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 14:24:39 -0800
References: <B8672F17.82FB%dante@umich.edu> <006a01c19c65$12bb9dc0$9fa242cf@bayeramd> <012001c19c6d$325b5820$9fa242cf@bayeramd> <001c01c19c7c$ae526e00$6401a8c0@twmi.rr.com>

I still cannot get my e-mails to come up on the list so will tag on this
one --

Many thanks to Ed, Tom Furlotte, and Ken Wilcox for helping me with my
problem with the lens.  It's OK now.

Sincerely,

Ted in Olalla

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Kowaleski" <ekowaleski@twmi.rr.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: Provia 100F or K64? (was: Re: [Leica] Film survey.)


> I haven't had a DR in a number of years but I think this is how to get
the
> lens out of the close focus position.  With the lens in close focus
mode,
> rotate the lens to the right until it stops against the center tab.
Pull
> the focus ring toward you gently until it clears the tab and then
rotate to
> the right and release on other right side of the tab.  The viewing
element
> can now be removed and the lens should focus in the normal
ode.  ----- Ed
> Kowaleski Original Message -----
> From: "Ted Bayer" <tedbayer@harbornet.com>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 3:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Provia 100F or K64? (was: Re: [Leica] Film survey.)
>
>
> >
> > I'm tagging on this last message in order to get help and also ask a
> > question.
> >
> > Need Help:
> >
> > I just ordered a 50mm Summicron f/2 Dual Range with eyes.  The lens
came
> > with the eyes attached and in the close-focus position.  I can turn
the
> > focusing ring in that mode OK, but I can't get the lens to go into
the
> > normal focus range.   It won't pull out and turn back to the proper
> > position.  Do I first need to mount it on the camera in order to do
> > that?  Don't want to damage anything so any help will be
appreciated.
> >
> > Question:
> >
> > I have now sent three e-mails to the group using the same address as
> > this one but none have appeared on my screen.  They just go into a
dark
> > hole somewhere.  Do you have to be a list member for a certain
period of
> > time before your e-mails to the list show up?
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ted Bayer
> > Olalla, Washington
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ted Bayer" <tedbayer@harbornet.com>
> > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 11:04 AM
> > Subject: Re: Provia 100F or K64? (was: Re: [Leica] Film survey.)
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I would agree - Kodachrome appears to be extremely stable over
time.
> > I
> > > just finished a project - went through over 3500 slides taken over
a
> > > period of almost 50 years that had been stored under less than
> > favorable
> > > conditions at times.
> > > All the Ks were perfect while the other types were, as mentioned,
> > faded
> > > to other color casts.
> > >
> > > Ted Bayer
> > > Olalla, WA
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see
http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see
http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "dante@umich.edu" <dante@umich.edu> (Re: Provia 100F or K64? (was: Re: [Leica] Film survey.))
Message from "Ted Bayer" <tedbayer@harbornet.com> (Re: Provia 100F or K64? (was: Re: [Leica] Film survey.))
Message from "Ted Bayer" <tedbayer@harbornet.com> (Re: Provia 100F or K64? (was: Re: [Leica] Film survey.))
Message from "Ed Kowaleski" <ekowaleski@twmi.rr.com> (Re: Provia 100F or K64? (was: Re: [Leica] Film survey.))