Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] patch flare
From: BOB KRAMER <BobKramer@COOPERCARRY.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:29:29 -0500

Here's my experience, for what its worth.  I have had my M4 for a little
over two years now, and I have never experienced any flare with it.  I have
used it under all kinds of lighting conditions and never a problem.  Same
with my M3 which I have had for over 20 years.

If you don't need the meter, its a no-brainer.  Get the M4.

BK

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Feliciano di Giorgio [mailto:feli@d2.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:33 AM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: [Leica] patch flare
> 
> 
> I was reading some messages on the LHSA regarding M improvements and
> someone
> mentioned the following:
> 
> >5.Put back the condensor lens that used to prevent the RF flare. 
> 
> Is this a change that occured when Leica went from the M3 style
> rangefinder
> system to what ended up in the M2, or was this something that happend
> with
> the advent of the M6? I have a M6TTL .85 and I must say that 
> out here in
> sunny California I'm suffering from chronic patch flare (yes, 
> I do keep
> the
> finder windows clean). I've heard that the M6 .72 and .58 are 
> less flare
> prone
> and the M4 even more so. Is there any truth to this? I am 
> thinking about
> getting a .72 as a second body and this would be a deciding factor. I
> can
> live without the built in meter of the M6 series, since I almost
> exclusively
> use a handheld meter.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> feli
> --
> To unsubscribe, see 
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html