Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Try looking in the archives here: http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/v02/msg09769.html "Robert G. Stevens" wrote: > > Ted: > > I have a Summarit, but have not used it for any of the stuff you > described. I tried a summar for that type of stuff and concluded it was > better just to use a modern lens and use a Tiffen Softar filter. > > In B&W it may be a different thing. I had a skinny 90mm Tele-Elmarit > that was not that great with slide film, but had beautiful results in > B&W. I saw a B&W picture of Clarke Gable backstage during the Academy > Awards using the Summarit. It was pretty impressive. > > Regards, > > Robert > > At 08:17 PM 1/4/2002 -0800, you wrote: > >Robert G. Stevens wrote: > > >>> With the cost of re coating a lens, it is probably cheaper to return the > > > lens to the seller and find one in better shape. The Summarit is not that > > > sharp and contrasty even in the best of shape when used at the wider > >apertures.<<<<<< > > > >Hi Rob, > > > >But this is the part of the Summarit that invites moody kind of > >pictures...... > > >>The Summarit is not that sharp and contrasty even in the best of shape > ><<<<<<<< > > > >If you use it where you want some interesting late night or shooting through > >blossoms or flowers at a beautiful woman and this lens is gorgeous wide open > >or nearly so. > > > >Actually some of them kind of mildew like create some very cool images. :-) > >Seriously! :-) > >ted > > > >Ted Grant Photography Limited > >www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant > > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html