Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] [OT] Jobo CPE-2...
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 17:50:03 -0800
References: <B85BAB11.75E7%Mail@SlideOne.com>

><Snip> 
> Yeah, I thought about it and reposted right after this first post asking if
> this was so...no one seemed to get that one? So it'll work fine for any full
> strength dillousion. So seeing as this is the case with XTOL in general,
> when dilluted, does that mean that Mark and the others are only developing
> 2-3 rolls in their 1 liter tanks to keep the 100ml of dev minimum per
> roll...???
> --
> John
> Chicago, IL


No I'm doing 4 rolls in a one lliter tank.
each roll gets 250 mls of liquid which is at 1:3
so each roll is getting 62.5 of Xtol.

below the minimum daily requments asked for by kodak by 37.5 mls!

Kodak states that this is only and issue with Tmax 100.

I find it also in issue with Delta 3200. So i go 1:1 on that.

But all the other films i've used in Xtol Works great at 1:3.



Mark Rabiner
Portland, Oregon USA
http://www.markrabiner.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> ([Leica] Re: Xtol methodology)
In reply to: Message from John Straus <Mail@SlideOne.com> (Re: [Leica] [OT] Jobo CPE-2...)