Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The 75 1.4 is a fabulous lens - but think of it as a 50 on steroids, rather than as a 90 on a diet...It simply doesn't have the reach necessary to make it really useful as a substitute for a 90, but if you step back a step or two, it has the field of view of a 50. And did I mention the fact that it is an incredible piece of glass? B. D. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Richard Hemingway Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:57 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: RE: [Leica] 75M or 90M 2.0 >I have the 75, and chose it over the 90 because I liked the images I saw >from the 75 better. I also wanted the razor thin DOF it offered over the - -- James, I have the same combination and find it about perfect for what I what I want to do. I had the 80/1.4 and 35/1.4 on the R8 which I also found to just what I wanted, although about twice as heavy. Dick Hemingway Plano, TX - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html