Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]i'm with david. i personally think of the 75M as more of a variation of the noctilux and use it in similar situations. the 90AA is when i want to say "telephoto" and do so with the utmost sharpness and contrast. as someone else had suggested, the 90 cron gen III (1980) is another reasonable (and much less expensive) alternative with performance an a line with the 75M. if your portraiture includes tight headshots, conventional wisdom would suggest that a 90mm offers the more flattering perspective. - -rei > From: leica@davidmorton.org > > James Harrison wrote: > > "I am going to buy a lens for portraiture. It will be either the current > 75M, or the current 90M 2.0. I use and like the R90 2.0 on a R-8 but have > never a 75..any preference?" > > Much as I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, the answer is that these > lenses are so utterly different in character that you can't sensibly choose > between them. I'm sorry to have to beak it to you that you need both. > > -- > David Morton > dmorton@journalist.co.uk - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html