Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 75M or 90M 2.0
From: "W Larsen" <wlarsen@ocsnet.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:04:01 -0800
References: <F5mm8huCIHk1aodrHg70001765b@hotmail.com>

What type of portraiture?  I have both the R90 2.0 and the
75M.  They are different in rendition.  The 75M is a very
interesting length.  You can get into a lot of places with
the 75 where the 90 forces you to frame more tightly than
you might wish.  If you are looking at environmental
portraiture, I think the 75 has advantages.

That being said, personally I would go for the 75 since you
already have the wonderful 90R-2.  You can always pick up
the 90 later.  (Neither of mine are for sale ;-) .  Yeah,
and it is heavy, and you learn to carry the camera by the
lens...

Regards, Bill Larsen
Terra Bella, CA

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "James Harrison" <leicajh@hotmail.com> ([Leica] 75M or 90M 2.0)