Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Libel has nothing to do with it. - ---------- >From: S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net> >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Subject: Re: [Leica] when is a pj not a pj? >Date: Sat, Dec 22, 2001, 12:06 AM > > You might want to read this little trifle; > http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0%2C1283%2C48996%2C00.html > Speaks volumes. > Slobodan Dimitrov > > "John M. Sikes, Jr." wrote: >> >> "Photo journalists" is an approbation given by the trade to itself. There >> is no civil or criminal statute or principle of law which exempts self >> styled PJ's from the consequences of their actions. >> When two persons act in knowing concert, as to outsiders they are equally >> responsible, as principal and agent in civil law and as co- conspirators in >> criminal law, regardless what names they give themselves. >> º > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html