Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] New M6 Titanium & suitability of M& for wildlife photography
From: Doug Herr <telyt@earthlink.net>
Date: 19 Dec 2001 11:49:47 -0800

On Wed, 19 December 2001, "koelwebdesign" wrote:
 
> 
> ok, this is going to hurt....
> 
> EOS-3 + > 400 mm
> 
> why is that out of the picture?
> I think it suits the job better than a Leica and MUCH better than a
> Hasselblad.
> 
 
electronics + rain & humidity.  EOS cameras usually work again after drying 'em out but there's a risk of downtime.  
 

Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
___________________________________________________
The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe
 Better!  Faster! More Powerful!
 250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now!
 http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/




- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com> (Re: [Leica] New M6 Titanium & suitability of M& for wildlifephotography)
Reply from "koelwebdesign" <leo@koelwebdesign.nl> (Re: [Leica] New M6 Titanium & suitability of M& for wildlife photography)