Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/12/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] New M6 Titanium & suitability of M& for wildlife photography
From: "koelwebdesign" <leo@koelwebdesign.nl>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 20:10:15 +0100
References: <B8460E5D.8EE2%cyberdog@attglobal.net> <001301c1889e$9cf07860$d80dc8d5@balcab.ch> <3C20CEF6.691A8BE9@markrabiner.com>
ok, this is going to hurt....
EOS-3 + > 400 mm
why is that out of the picture?
I think it suits the job better than a Leica and MUCH better than a
Hasselblad.
> > By the way - I_m interested in the M6 only because of my interest in
> > photographing parrots in the rainforests of South America.
Leo Kuiper
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> (Re: [Leica] New M6 Titanium & suitability of M& for wildlife photography)
In reply to:
Message from "fs" <frank.shaw@balcab.ch> (Re: [Leica] New M6 Titanium & suitability of M& for wildlife photography)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> (Re: [Leica] New M6 Titanium & suitability of M& for wildlife photography)