Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]on 12/16/01 1:10 AM, Steve LeHuray at icommag@toad.net wrote: > You should also consider which lens will hold it's value the best in the > long term--I would wager it will not be the CV. True but at $500 new the CV doesn't have far to fall. The 28/2 is like standing on the top floor of the Sears Tower. Percent being equal I'd lose an easy $500 on the Leica from normal use and depreciation. I'd probably lose $200 at most on the CV for the same use/depr. - -- John Chicago, IL http://SlideOne.com ==================== - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html