Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] tri-elmar ?...
From: "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@home.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 15:34:10 -0700
References: <149.6582900.294b8805@aol.com>

Merci beaucoup...Jo Bontemps...Steve



> Dans un courrier daté du 14/12/01 08:38:08 Paris, Madrid,
kididdoc@home.com a
> écrit :
>
> > The Tri Elmar after the first version was available for a short time,
was
> >  revised. A  second  version was released with some mechanical changes,
this
> >  being still available...... What excatly were the problems with the
first
> >  version, and what changes were introduced for the second Version...
> >
> >
> >  Is it risky to buy the first version......out of concern for any
mechanical
> >  flaw or risk of failure...Steve
> >
>
> Hello Steve . I had the fisrt one . It was less firm in terms of focal
> selection ,
> and also the focusing ring seemed harder due to the lack of a tab , which
> they
> add on the later one .
> Optically , the new is the same . Mecanically , it's a little shorter ,
> thinner at
> it's end , and as got a nice tab on the focusing ring .
> The first version doesn't show any mecanical flaw and you can buy it
without
> problem .
> Chears
>
> Jo Goodtimes , France
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from V8PWR@aol.com (Re: [Leica] tri-elmar ?...)