Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] 35 LTM Summicron question
From: "Jeffery L.Smith" <jsmith45@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 17:20:09 -0600

Yikes. If the fungus is still alive, it can still etch the glass.
Perhaps you should mail it to yourself in a suspicious box, and let the
postal service nuke it.

I would get that cleaned up ASAP.

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Dan Post
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 4:31 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] 35 LTM Summicron question


John and Seth-
Thanks for the info. I did indeed grab it up for a ridiculous price--- I
pointed out what appears to be a spot of fungus on the inside rear
element (doesn't appear severe enough to etch the glass). I got it, and
they threw in the M2-28-35/M3-135 adapter ring to boot. Gratis! They
were selling an M2 (just CLA'd) that looks very nice, but has a few
chips in the vulcanite, but the owner wanted around a grand for it, and
they have been selling for a lot less in what appears to be a 'soft'
market. I would suppose it could be had for $750-800 with a little
persuasion! They also had an almost pristine M3- early with the slotted
rewind, ceramic pressure plate, and without the preview lever- so it is
early. Just a few bright marks. If I didn't already have two I'd jump on
it! I think after a trip to Sherry for a CLA on this lens, I might keep
it- it looks great on both the M6 and the M3!! (Or is it too rare to
use!?
~    )
Thanks again.
Dan

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Dan Post" <dpost@triad.rr.com> (Re: [Leica] 35 LTM Summicron question)