Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]i'm surprised, especially since the depth of field of the 35Ti, even wide open, is a foot and a half at 6 feet! you shouldn't really need pinpoint focusing accuracy here. my contax T2 definitely goes wild once in a while and focuses heaven-knows- where. but usually it does a pretty good job and 8x10s look very nice. the 35Ti is supposed to be about the same performance. maybe the 35Ti is not working at 100%? - -rei > From: "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com> > > I like [the Nikon 35Ti], as well. > > I haven't used it much since I bought my Leica, but I have occasionally. > > That use is going to be dramatically diminished now that I got a 4000 dpi > scanner. Even though it's pretty accurate with focusing, it just can't do > the critical focusing that I can acheive with my M6. At least not for > portraits. I can get the eyelashes sharp with my M6. I get fuzzy eyelashes > with my 35Ti. Never noticed this in 4x6 prints. Never had any big > enlargements made from my 35Ti previously. > > > Eric - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html