Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] NOCTILUX/ Canon
From: "Jeffery Smith" <jsmith45@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 19:38:22 -0600

Spill it, Colin. The Canon 1.0 is a clam?

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Colin
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 7:09 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: RE: [Leica] NOCTILUX/ Canon
>
>
> I'm biting my tongue.  Ow.  Please don't ask that anymore :D
>
> Regards,
> Colin
> http://www.availabledark.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of
> > Marc James Small
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:37 PM
> > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > Subject: RE: [Leica] NOCTILUX/ Canon
> >
> >
> > At 03:55 PM 12/11/01 -0600, Jeffery L.Smith wrote:
> > >I have heard nothing but mediocre reviews of the 0.95 Canon
> > lens. For
> > >fast lenses, the ranking is always:
> > >
> > >Noctilux 1.0	best
> > >Canon 50/1.2	okay
> > >Canon 50/.95	avoid
> > >
> >
> > What about the Canon EF 50mm f/1 lens?
> >
> > Marc
> >
> > msmall@roanoke.infi.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
> > Cha robh bąs fir gun ghrąs fir!
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see
> > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-> users/unsub.html
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html