Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] NOCTILUX/ Canon
From: Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 19:37:17 +0000
References: <112.9384080.2947cdc6@aol.com>

At 03:55 PM 12/11/01 -0600, Jeffery L.Smith wrote:
>I have heard nothing but mediocre reviews of the 0.95 Canon lens. For
>fast lenses, the ranking is always:
>
>Noctilux 1.0	best
>Canon 50/1.2	okay
>Canon 50/.95	avoid
>

What about the Canon EF 50mm f/1 lens?

Marc

msmall@roanoke.infi.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
Cha robh bąs fir gun ghrąs fir!

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Dr. Elliot Puritz" <drpuritz@bellsouth.net> ([Leica] SF 20 Flash and M setting)
Reply from "Dr. Elliot Puritz" <drpuritz@bellsouth.net> ([Leica] TriElmar and shade)
In reply to: Message from ARTHURWG@aol.com (Re: [Leica] NOCTILUX/ Canon)