Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] NOCTILUX/ Canon
From: Feliciano di Giorgio <feli@d2.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 14:51:21 -0800
References: <005301c1828e$7ca157c0$a36dfea9@JSMITH> <3C168355.6080807@earthlink.net>

"B. D. Colen" wrote:
> 
> And how much did you pay for the Canon 50 1.2? I hate to say it, because
> I know I must be wrong, and I certainly know I will be flamed, but the
> entire 1.2 image looks pretty good - with much better Bokeh than I have
> seen demonstrated with the Noctilux - and the shot at f 8 looks terrific.
> 
> Once again, these are lens meant to primarilly be used when there is no
> alternative. If you can get more out of them, great....
> 
> B. D.

I think I just heard a good dozend LUG members, in unison across the
world,
scream out in terror and disbelief as they fell out of their chairs.

;-)

feli
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Jeffery L.Smith" <jsmith45@bellsouth.net> (RE: [Leica] NOCTILUX/ Canon)
Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] NOCTILUX/ Canon)