Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]someone cleverer than i pointed out to me that for a GIVEN MAGNIFICATION, the noctilux is still DOF champ. in other words, you need to scale the distance by the focal length so that a cat or a face would be approximately the same size on the negative for each lens. using my favorite calculator: http://members.home.net/gillettm/DOF.html we get: f.l. f.stop. distance DOF 35 1.4 1.4m 13.1cm 50 1.0 2.0m 9.4cm 75 1.4 3.0m 13.1cm 90 2.0 3.6m 18.7cm the most surprising is that given these constraints, the 35 lux at 1.4m has the same DOF as the 75 lux at 3.0m! - -rei > From: "Steve LeHuray" <icommag@toad.net> > > > someone sed: > > > >> Plus, I love the > >> shallow depth of field that the 1.0 lets me use. > > > > i think someone posted a couple months ago a list of the DOF of various > > leica lenses -- i was suprised to learn that the noctilux wasn't really even > > terribly close to having the shallowest DOF (3rd or 4th if i recall) > > > > kyle > > -- > 3rd, with MORE dof than a 75 or 90. Why is that shocking? The longer the > focal length, the less depth of field. > > sl - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html