Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]George, I agree. But we learn a lot more when someone goes a step further after their snapshot declaration. Tell me why it is a snapshot and I can better learn from my pedestrian photos. I learn from my mistakes only if I know what they are. If you tell me it is a snapshot and dont' help me see why, I will continue to take snapshots (and we all lose -- I take snaps and you have to keep lookin' at 'em :-). Sometimes the next step is forthcoming after the snapshot declartion, sometimes we get only the declaration... The declaration may be objective, but it can also be glib. Advice on how to travel the road from pedestrian to more professional photography is always appreciated. /matt > Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 16:44:29 -0800 >From: George Day <george@rdcinteractive.com> >Subject: Re: [Leica] Jim's Brickbats was: I commend to your attention > >Frankly, I have to second Jim. There's a lot of sensitivity on the list, it >seems to me, to any sort of criticism unless it's praise. Well, a snap shot >is a snap shot is a snap shot. That's not being insulting, it's just being >objective. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html