Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] CL or Bessa T?
From: "Tim Atherton" <tim@KairosPhoto.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:18:10 -0700

ahhh - okay - ignore it. Bessa-T doh!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Tim
> Atherton
> Sent: December 4, 2001 11:45 AM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: RE: [Leica] CL or Bessa T?
>
>
>
> > >Sonny,
> > > Your point about the CL being able to use Leica lenses that it is not
> > >supposed to be able to use is well taken.  The Bessa T can not use all
> > >Leica M lenses.  The body is not deep enough inside the lens mount  to
> > >take a 35 ,2.0 M lens, for instance.  The part of the lens that extends
> > >back beyond the lens mount hits the interior of the camera before it
> > >locks into place and thus can not be mounted.  I have not tried every
> > >other  lens to see if this is true across the board.  I stopped
> > >considering this body when the 35 would not mount.
> > >Tom Furlotte
> > >Memphis
>
> I don't quite understand this... Which 35 f2 lens? As I recall,
> my Summicron
> worked fine - only slight problem is the lens focusses to about .7m while
> the CL only focusses to .8 - but I don't focus that close very often...
>
> The CL does pretty well with most "standard" M lenses.
>
> Tim A
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html