Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: quadtones rule!
From: "lea" <lea@whinydogpress.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 08:22:16 -0600
References: <i93k0u8ltdbcgk92cfo8v2hov29ibm94ue@4ax.com>

Eric,

Congratulations on all your learning.

Don't you just love this sport? Keep at it...there's a lifetime of good
things ahead of you.
Lea

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 5:22 AM
Subject: [Leica] OT: quadtones rule!


> I'm going to assume that I'm not the very last LUGger to get a scanner and
> printer.  (Big assumption, I know.)  For everybody who already thinks this
> is pretty obvious, go ahead and ignore the rest.  :)
>
> I was talking with Mr. Split Printer (or is that Split Personality?)
> himself, Mark Rabiner, who told me I shouldn't be printing black & white
> images with black ink.  Whoudda thunk I'd get better B&W prints by using 3
> colors + black?  Wet or dry (split printing conventionally or
> inkjetting)...with his advice, my prints just keep looking better and
> better!
>
> I've also discovered the evils of having other people process your film.
> The tiny scratches didn't show up as much when I was printing my negs in
the
> darkroom, but they *really* show up scanned at 4000 dpi.
>
> I've also discovered that autofocusing on a baby's eyes with a 35mm lens
> isn't the same as manually focusing with my M6 and a 35mm lens.  The
> difference doesn't show up that much in a print when viewed from a normal
> distance, but the difference blown up is pretty astounding.
>
>
> Eric
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com> ([Leica] OT: quadtones rule!)