Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]on 11/25/01 6:39 PM, Sonny Carter at sonc@sonc.com wrote: > Seth sez: > >> How about remembering that our friend has started with an R-3 and 50 >> Summicron-R. Yes, add a 90 (2,8?) and maybe the 25/4 Voigtlander/Cosina. But >> why not suggest a second R-body, say an R-6.2 or R-7? The R-3 is a budget >> Japanese Leica one can buy mint/mint for $325.-375. Then $4,000. for a set of >> lenses for that single body? Hmmm. >> >> Seth LaK 9 > > > So, are you suggesting we should not use Leica lenses on our R3's? Oh, and > does V > /C make a 25 f4 for the R? > > My R3 says "Portugal" on the bottom, like so many other R's of various > denominations. > > Unless you are joking, and forgot the "smiley . . . " > > Hmmm, indeed. What a confusing letter you write, Seth. > > Regards, > > Sonny > http://www.sonc.com > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html The R3 is almost a screw for screw clone of the Minolta XE XE1 XE7 nark - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html