Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Scanner (was High altitude question)
From: David Rodgers <drodgers@swiftnet.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:21:25 -0800

Mitch,

I was leaning toward the 4000 too. But I decided that resolution isn't my 
biggest issue. Time and cost are. I want to be able to batch scan a whole 
roll of film unmanned. I can't do that now. I'm now leaning toward the 
Kodak 3600 which scan complete rolls as is. The NCS4000 requires a $500 
adaptor. Plus the Kodak comes with 100 free rolls of film.  I've talked to 
several people who purchased the Kodak and they seem very satisfied.

Tough decision, especially since I'm running low on E100SW. I also like 
E200. Velvia isn't part of the program, unfortunately :-) With film running 
$7 a roll the Kodak scanner is quite a deal. Whereas the Nikon scanner cost 
more than the Leica lens next on my list to acquire! Again, it's difficult 
to decide.

Dave

At 09:39 AM 11/19/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Nikon Coolscan 4000 is what I'm leaning toward.
>
>/Mitch Zeissler

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from David Rodgers <drodgers@swiftnet.com> (Re: [Leica] Scanner (was High altitude question))