Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Non-Leica lenses for available light
From: "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 16:58:11 -0600
References: <FE389C5B196ED511AB210090273CEFD07B6DA9@cca_exchng.ccapr.com> <FE389C5B196ED511AB210090273CEFD058D032@cca_exchng.ccapr.com>

On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:51:17 -0500, "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@ccapr.com> wrote:

>Well I know it's a Leica list - having been on it for a number of years
>- but using the word "advocate" to describe someone who would take
>umbrage at a Nikon mention is definitely using the wrong term...The
>correct term does beginning with an "a," but I believe it ends in "e."

Amiable?
Adorable?
Admirable?
Allowable?
Acceptable?

Don't leave us hanging, B.D.!  Provide more clues!!


Eric
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <rabiner2@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Non-Leica lenses for available light)
In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@ccapr.com> (RE: [Leica] Non-Leica lenses for available light)