Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I can't tell you how much I appreciate Mr Brick's comments. I run the digital part of Ford Photographic and can spend hours on internet lists trying to find a few scraps of the insight Jim so generously shares. It is such a rapidly evolving field that half truths abound. My question: Every thing I output is an electronic file, either from digital or a scan. Isn't the Leica advantage pointed out by Jim negated by the scanning process? Having read the Putt's view on scanner tests (pretty bleak) is there anything capable of preserving the Leica edge when transferring to the electronic medium, or can we only see this in original prints? In my head I ( perhaps incorrectly) see a scanner as just a bulky digital camera. I own a D1x and a DCS 760 (and lots of M's) and confess that I get some great images ( we have a Lightjet 5000) from the digital. They are tools that work very well when instant feedback and transmission are necessary (press conference to wire in 15 min) but my first love is the intimacy of the M. Digital is not easier, it presents a whole new set of issues ( corrupted files, moire, strange red flair). But is it better to shoot film and scan? Is the leica advantage thrown out when scanned, it it necessary to use a drum scan to preserve it? Jim & others, your thoughts? - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html