Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/11/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I do agree - that´s why I wrote of Photodo´s "peculiar weighting system" - the decreased performance in the extreme corners is insignificant. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen - -----Alkuperäinen viesti----- Lähettäjä: David Rodgers <drodgers@swiftnet.com> Vastaanottaja: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Päivä: 02. marraskuuta 2001 2:23 Aihe: Re: Vs: [Leica] Photodo ratings for 35mm Summilux -MASPH and 50mm Summilux-M >Raimo, > >And in practice, the extreme corners of the frame are most often out of >focus and meaningless when shooting at wide apertures. I can only think of >a few applications where the corners are really important. Take, for >instance, landscapes or architectural shots where corner to corner razer >sharpness is important. These are best shot at middle and small apertures, >and with the use of a tripod. > >Dave > >At 06:15 PM 11/1/2001 +0100, you wrote: >>When you look at the graphs you notice that the performance of the 35 >>drops off steeply at the extreme corners of the frame. This and the >>peculiar weighting system of Photodo may be the reason. >>All the best! >>Raimo >>Personal photography homepage at >>http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html