Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/10/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Further review of the magnifier, in response to questions asked about its advantages,,,,,, The basis is the M6 with .72 or .85 VF image, and the 75/1.4 or 90/2AA lenses. I no longer have a 50/1 to make comment, but the 50mm VF image is somewhat hard to see with the magnifier and a .72 body. Do you wear glasses? A pivotal question.... The magnified image, when used with the .72 and a 75 is maybe a bit bigger, but a bit darker but more difficult to see than the .85 would be alone. In addition, the .85, with the magnifier, would give you a bigger image, but at the cost of more difficult eye placement to get that image.... This sounds a bit more involved than it really is.... basically, if you can afford to CARRY both the .72 and .85 bodies, the magnifier is a waste of time, and inhibits ease of use. I am not trying to talk you out of the magnifier, but its use, as in many things, relates to the need for certain requirements to be met at the same time. It is a compromise. That compromise is brightness, and eye placement ( ease if setting the eye in the "sweet spot" ) on one hand : and weight, cost and flexibility on the other. Is there an improvement in focus accuracy with the magnifier on? Yes, but the cost of that improvement is a darker image, which reduces focus accuracy in a non-scientifically-predictable way. It decreases contrast. A further comment.... Using a RF camera is unlike an SLR. You get to see what is NOT in the frame, making your image choice from a bigger field without moving the camera.... An SLR is a WYSIWYG product. If you were trained to use the M series in this way, the image you see with the magnifier reduces that out of image area. Is that an advantage? that depends on you. Frank Filippone red735i@earthlink.net - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html