Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/10/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Elmar 50mm versions
From: Feliciano di Giorgio <feli@d2.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 16:46:35 -0700
References: <200110031727.KAA17281@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <3BBB7D44.E8E8D826@ldp.com> <3BBCC07F.A1A0A0F7@d2.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20011004142616.036db788@pop.alink.net> <5.1.0.14.2.20011004161442.036b9768@pop.alink.net>
 
I'm thinking about getting a 50mm Elmar and had a few questions my
reference books couldn't answer. Perhaps someone here can shed some
light on this.


1) Are all postwar LTM Elmar 50mm/3.5 coated?

2) Is the early 50mm/3.5 and 50mm/2.8 in M mount coated?

3) Does anyone notice a big difference in contrast/flare
   between the 50/3.5 coated/uncoated and the 2.8?


Thanks,

feli

- -- 
________________________________________________________________________

 "It's truly one of those shows where you just keep expecting Allen Funt
 to come bursting out from behind some 2-way mirror and explain that
 you've been on candid camera for 3 years."
                       -Ethan Ormsby on the status of production, 1999
________________________________________________________________________
        Feli di Giorgio * Compositing Supervisor * DIGITAL DOMAIN
       			      feli@d2.com * Ext. 3074
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to: Message from Feliciano di Giorgio <feli@d2.com> ([Leica] double exposure)
Message from Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> ([Leica] Re: double exposure)
Message from Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> ([Leica] Re: Re: double exposure)