Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/09/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes Pascal; I read the Nato press release very very "*carefully*" twice prior to posting. My "blanket statement", in context, with everything else I wrote still stands. What do you believe this Nato's Press Release really means, especially in light of today's specific information regarding the individuals who flew the civilian aircraft into civilian buildings full of people? What do you know of Mohammed Atah recently of Hollywood, Florida? In the end it doesn't really matter what you or I believe the Nato countries do or do not mean. Nato will make their intentions known soon enough. Your thoughts are most welcome off list. Regards, Greg Pascal wrote: > > May I suggest you read *carefully* this NATO statement, made by the Council > on 12 September, before making such blanket statement: > > http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/2001/p01-124e.htm > http://www.nato.int/terrorism/index.htm > > Other than that, I would really appreciate it if the terrorism thread could > be taken up elsewhere, and not in this Leica photography-related group. > > Pascal > NO ARCHIVE > > ----------- > See my Leica pages at http://www.leicapages.com > ---------- > <<< PGP public key available on request >>> > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Greg J. > > Lorenzo > > > I agree with you completely. However, the US has requested, and NATO has > > agreed that these horrific attacks be treated as an Article 5 attack on > > all NATO member states. This has never occurred before.