Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/09/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Nathan's picture of Week 35
From: "Steve LeHuray" <icommag@toad.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 19:45:48 -0500

>><Snip> 
>> 
>> BTW, did anybody notice in Erwin's Newsletter today, he ranks the Summilux
>> 50/1.4 better than the Noctilux under all circumstances.
>>
>> sl
>
> I think the Noctilux might still win out at F1!
>
> but I'd be surprised Erwin saying the Summilux beating out the Noctilux in
stray
> artifacts from off camera and on camera light sources as this was what the
> Noctilux was specifically designed to do as a low light night lens while the
> Summilux was of course designed for general purposes.
>
>
> Mark Rabiner
>
> Portland, Oregon
> USA
>
> http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/
>
Maybe, except at 1.4 you can say go from a 60th to a 30th to get the same
shot the Noct gets at 1.0, and 1.4 is better than 1.0.

sl

Replies: Reply from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Nathan's picture of Week 35)
Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Nathan's picture of Week 35)