Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/09/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Summicron 32/f2
From: Feliciano di Giorgio <feli@d2.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 20:59:04 -0700
References: <B7BAF410.14599%jbcollier@powersurfr.com>

Hmmm, if you had your pick, which one would you take? The extra stop
is tempting (especialy if you are shooting hand held) and I think a
little glow looks nice in low light situations.

feli


John Collier wrote:
> 
> The 35/1.4 is remarkably similar to the fourth version of the 35/2 up to f2.
> Its performance at f1.4 is soft and flare prone which some people like. A
> good review of the lens was in the LHSA viewfinder a while back. It has
> always been a low volume lens but a cursory search found a few out there for
> sale:
> 

- -- 
________________________________________________________________________

 "It's truly one of those shows where you just keep expecting Allen Funt
 to come bursting out from behind some 2-way mirror and explain that
 you've been on candid camera for 3 years."
                       -Ethan Ormsby on the status of production, 1999
________________________________________________________________________
        Feli di Giorgio * Compositing Supervisor * DIGITAL DOMAIN
       			      feli@d2.com * Ext. 3074

In reply to: Message from John Collier <jbcollier@powersurfr.com> (Re: [Leica] Summicron 32/f2)