Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/09/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] dim witted
From: "Steve LeHuray" <icommag@toad.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 20:11:20 -0500

Brian Reid says:


> Please let us not insult one another on this list. I am considering whether
> Anthony should remain on this list not because of his brain power, his
> politics, his education, or the quality of his pictures. I am considering
> it only because his contributions to the list seem to reduce the value of
> the list for its other members. In my opinion, he is extremely smart, well
> educated, and is a better photographer than I am. He just has a way of
> annoying people, which makes those other qualities irrelevant. If this were
> some other forum besides a global discussion group oriented towards
> photography with a certain style of camera, these qualities might not
> matter at all.


If we were asked to vote (which we are not) on Anthony staying or leaving I
would vote that he stay. Some of my friends on the LUG would disagree with
me on this, but lets just remember it takes TWO to have a punchup.
Personally Anthony does not bother me, and in fact find him to be
intelligent and honest.

I humbly suggest that the LUGers who are annoyed by Anthony remember that
'there are all kinds of flowers in the garden.'

sl

Replies: Reply from Chandos Michael Brown <cmbrow@wm.edu> (Re: [Leica] dim witted)