Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Re: 90mm f1.0 - dumb question probably
From: Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 18:45:37 -0700
References: <EC1D893EF5042348ADC8A79B742E9EFB030E14@GCI-MOCEX01.us.ad.gannett.com> <p0510030bb7b40884e1b3@[209.53.33.194]> <3B8E81C7.EC64C807@pce.net> <3B8E9307.D014D2E5@pce.net> <p05100310b7b472eae0e6@[209.53.33.194]> <5.1.0.14.2.20010830180433.02595880@AXCS20.cos.agilent.com>

At 6:07 PM -0700 8/30/01, Jim Brick wrote:
>Could someone please tell me what these lenses are good for, except 
>the known use... a paper weight. Being computed for the x-ray 
>spectrum, it couldn't possibly produce a usable image using the 
>visible spectrum and film.
>
>Could it?

Yes it could. They are not for use in the X-ray spectrum, but to 
image fluorescence on a screen onto film. This fluorescence is 
usually fairly dim and you want to expose any person in the area to 
as little radiation as possible, thus the high speed. It's also 
monochromatic, usually in the green area of the spectrum and thus 
needs to be corrected for only that wavelength group.

On the other hand, are hardly  useful lenses for general photography.
- -- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com

In reply to: Message from "Zeissler, Mitch" <mzeissle@gcipoa.gannett.com> (RE: [Leica] f/0.3 Noctilux)
Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (RE: [Leica] f/0.3 Noctilux)
Message from Rob McElroy <idag@pce.net> ([Leica] Re: 90mm f1.0 -was f/0.3 Noctilux)
Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> ([Leica] Re: 90mm f1.0 -was f/0.3 Noctilux)
Message from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: Re: 90mm f1.0 - dumb question probably)