Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 33 and 34
From: Guy Bennett <gbennett@lainet.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:10:47 -0800
References: <v04011700b7b2af187e9f@[66.81.32.39]> from "Guy Bennett" at Aug 29, 1 06:43:26 am

>i agree.  the beach was best-of-paw.  i'd like to try it myself,
>but i'm very paranoid about bringing photo equipment anywhere near
>the beach.
>
>-rei


Why? As long as you're not in the water and it's not too windy, you
shouldn't have a problem with shooting at the beach.

I've done so many times with an M6 (and IIIf) sans UV filter and have never
had a problem.

Get out there Rei, and make some pictures!

Guy




>> From: Guy Bennett <gbennett@lainet.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 33 and 34
>>
>> I particularly liked the infrared images you made - you managed to
>> capitalize on how good infrared film can be *without* emphasizing its
>> "bizarre" qualities. Your pix seem natural, and the tonal values
>> intensified.
>>
>> The one I liked best was:
>>
>> >http://www.wajsman.com/34.jpg

In reply to: Message from Guy Bennett <gbennett@lainet.com> (Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 33 and 34)