Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Salgado
From: ternahan <ternahan@sonic.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 13:29:15 -0700

It makes me want to go and look again.
trish
ternahan@gentlelens.net


> From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
> Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 14:30:45 -0400
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Salgado
> 
> Yah, I know...and God knows I should be thrown in an acid bath if I do
> that...but think about it for a minute....Smith's stuff is heavy with
> shadows and dark areas, many burned to hell and gone in the
> darkroom....while Salgado does do amazing things with light....sorry to
> put it in art-critic speak...;-)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Tim Atherton wrote:
>> 
>>> but the styles of the two couldn't be more different...Smith
>>> painted with shadows - Salgado paints with light.
>>> 
>>> B. D.
>>> 
>> 
>> Oh BD - be very careful - that is veering dangerously close to art-critic
>> speak....
>> 
>> Tim A
>