Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Compendium Review
From: Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 18:40:19 -0400
References: <3.0.6.32.20010801171646.00b7ae40@pop.infi-net.mindspring.com>

At 05:48 PM 8/1/01 -0400, Austin Franklin wrote:
>Better look behind you, or you're going to get run over!  Have you ever SEEN
>a Piezo print your self just to see how inadequate and boring it is?
>
>Austin...who doesn't have a microwave (well, one that's out of the attic
>anyway) and who does listen to CDs...does not use digital cameras...but DOES
>scan his woefully inadequate snapshots on his DIGITAL scanner and prints
>them on his DIGITAL printer...

I haven't a clue what you are babbling about, Austin.  Whatever is a "Piezo
print" and, in the end, who gives a hoot?

The bottom line is that chemistry beats digital around 85 to 1 at the
moment.  Or is that 185:1?

When digital can hold its sorry head up in public, I'll consider it an
honourable source.  In the meantime, it is a sorry second adopted by losers.

Marc

msmall@roanoke.infi.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
Cha robh bąs fir gun ghrąs fir!

Replies: Reply from Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net> (RE: [Leica] Compendium Review)
In reply to: Message from Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net> (RE: [Leica] Compendium Review)