Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]- --Re: While they were at it a second round of proof-reading would have been in order. There are far to many minor typos. I got the book. I think Erwin should have paid a second year physics student 500 gulden to check the physics explanations in the book which sometimes get very shaky, especially if they prove a point he's making. The usual Erwin verbosity gives is there to give you the feeling something scientific is going on, where there of course isn't, see the recent hilarious hexar/m6 focus accuracy test. This book is my first introduction to lens aberrations, and because of the shaky physics I do not have the feeling I can trust him on this subject. --ps/032