Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: NG
From: Ken Geter <kgeter@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 06:28:05 -0700 (PDT)

"Quite banal", well I'm sure many NG subscribers would disagree. I was
simply trying to stir some interest in what a respected group of pro
photographers are doing with Leica equipment - maybe generate some
discussion on this list about photographs instead of more minutiae on
bokeh, scanner resolution, and nail biting.  Talk about "quite banal".

- --- christian becker <polylux@gmx.co.uk> wrote:
> D.B. Colen wrote: 
> >And, finally, believe it or not, there are some folks who believe
> that
> >much of the photography in the National Geographic is, while
> perfectly
> >exposed and composed, quite banal.
> 
> SIGH! Finally someone who has the gut to say this!
> 
> 
> -- 
>  
>                                                                 
>    ****       **     **   **    ** **      **  **   ***     ***
>    *  **    **  **   **    **  **  **      **  **    ***   ***
>    *  **   **    **  **     ****   **      **  **     *** ***
>    ***     **    **  **      **    **      **  **      *****
>    **       **  **   **      **    **      **  **     *** ***
>    **         **     ******  **    ******  ******    ***   ***
> 
> 
> Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net
> 


=====
Reply to:
kgeter@yahoo.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

Replies: Reply from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: NG)
Reply from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> ([Leica] Thanks)
Reply from "Barney Quinn, Jr." <barney@ncep.noaa.gov> (Re: [Leica] Re: NG)
Reply from Rich Lahrson <tripspud@transbay.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: NG)