Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] 35/2 ASPH vs non ASPH
From: "Ken Iisaka" <ken@iisaka.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:13:53 -0700
References: <NABBLIJOIFAICKBIEPJJKELLKLAA.darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
 
Actually, the proper spelling is boke, but most English speakers would
pronounce it like poke.  H was added to stress the e.

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 6:56 PM
Subject: RE: [Leica] 35/2 ASPH vs non ASPH


> > I don't count on wide angle lenses giving great bokey,
>
> bokeH either....  How'd that one get by my spell checker ;-)
>
>
In reply to: Message from "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> (RE: [Leica] 35/2 ASPH vs non ASPH)