Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]No, Frank. There are opinions, and then there are statements of fact. JD's statement was one of fact: saying that a $2 lens would equal in quality a $1000 lens" is "completely ludicrous ranting." If you want to argue that a Leica M lens used on a digital body will not produce as "leicalike" an image as a Leica lens on a film body, fine. But to state what you did.... ROFLOL... B. D. Frank Filippone wrote: > > Every man to his own opinion........ the future will (may?) prove out the > truth. > > Frank Filippone > red735i@earthlink.net > > on 7/22/01 11:03 AM, Frank Filippone at red735i@earthlink.net wrote: > > > But the fine details and micro-bokeh-fuzzy-artsy stuff > > will be lost...... thjerfore a $2 lens would equal in quality a $10000 > > lens. > > this is completely ludicrous ranting > > -- > John Brownlow