Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] crayons vs. markers
From: "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 11:38:10 +0200
References: <3.0.6.32.20010721232432.0079baf0@hiwaay.net>

Brad Daly writes:

> i think that people who want to use digital
> cameras should use digital cameras and that
> people who want to use film cameras should
> use film cameras.

The question here, though, is:  What happens if the company that makes the
cameras you know and love decides to go out on a limb and make a completely
different camera, in the hope of making more money?  And what happens if the
company is so small that it can't really do this without negatively affecting
the cameras _you_ prefer?

Look at it this way:  If Leica cannot make digital and film cameras (and it
cannot), and if it throws its modest resources behind digital cameras, the
classic M will suffer.  Now, do you think that people who like the classic M
(unparalleled reliability and sturdiness, simplicity, etc.) are _also_ people
who like complex and newfangled digital cameras?  Do you think that people who
buy Leica Ms because of the unique niche they occupy in the market will run out
and buy Leica digitals that are clones of every other digicam in existence, but
at three times the price?  I don't think so.  Thus, Leica loses the M market,
and gains nothing in return, and so do you.

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] crayons vs. markers)
In reply to: Message from brad daly <bwdaly@hiwaay.net> ([Leica] crayons vs. markers)