Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] re: should i buy a noctilux
From: "Barney Quinn, Jr." <barney@ncep.noaa.gov>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:03:39 -0400
References: <F263456UnHAaaz7EjQx0000d1fe@hotmail.com>

Guys...

Whole Stops:

1, 1.4, 2. 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128

All you need to remember is 1 and 1.4. You can rebuild the entire sequence by
multiplying every other number by 2. The next f-stop is always the one before
last in the list times 2. If this is too much like the college boards write the
list down on a piece of paper, put it in your wallet, and go have a single malt.
:-) NB  This isn't how the math works, it's just a way of being able to built an
f stop table without memorizing it.

1
1.4

2=1x2
2.8=1.4x2

4=2x2
5.6=2.8x2

8=2x4
11=5.6x2

16=2x8
22=2x11

Barney

Ethel Red wrote:

> >From: Kyle Cassidy
> >
> >fwiw, f 1.0 is NOT one stop faster than f 1.4, it's only a third of a stop
> >faster. so unless you're looking at your images and shaking your head
> >saying "damit! it's a third of a stop underexposed!" you're okay with your
> >summilux...
>
> Sorry Kyle. f:1 is indeed a full stop faster. Do the math.
>
> Just as f:2 is two full stops faster than f:4, f:1 is two full stops faster
> than f:2.
>
> f:1 means that the diameter of the aperture is the same as the focal length.
> It's a fraction actually. f:2 means the diameter of the aperture is 1/2 the
> focal length. At 1/2 the diameter, the area is 1/4 thereby letting in 1/4 as
> much light, or two full stops.
>
> PJW
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

In reply to: Message from "Ethel Red" <ethel_red@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] re: should i buy a noctilux)