Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Aric, I would suggest developing the two rolls with two bath diafine developer. I used diafine with Pan X for many years and rated my Pan X at ASA 200. With diafine you stand the best chance of getting the best results from the unknowns regarding the two rolls. Richard Mendocino CA At 08:23 AM 7/13/01 -0700, you wrote: >I really thought we were done with this. Perhaps a good metric for >character here on the LUG would be the ability to resist waxing political in >a forum in which it is understood that politics are not OT. > >I have very strongly held political opinions, which apparently are 180 >degrees out of phase with most of the LUG members who choose to engage in >political sniping in this forum. I have resisted responding on a political >level, and will continue to do so. > >Marc's acknowledgment that he made a mistake in responding to a politically >charged comment is admirable, and he sets a good example. > >I joined the LUG to learn of matters Leica. > >Aric > >(who now fully expects to be flamed to cinders :) > >P.S.: Still looking for suggestions for developer for a roll of Panatomic-X >and TMAX 100, both exposed about 10 years ago, at unknown EIs. > >Thanks > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Henry Posner [mailto:henryp@bhphotovideo.com] >> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 10:28 AM >> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >> Subject: [Leica] Re: Where We Post From >> >> >> At 12:15 AM 07/13/2001, you wrote: >... > >