Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Heliopan Circular Polarizer Filter
From: Ken Wilcox <wilcox@tir.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 11:23:02 -0400

Tom:

As I understand it (and I may be incorrect) the Kasemann and "regular"
polarizer is that the Kasemann is completely sealed with the filter and the
"regular" has edges that are not sealed. I also understand that the larger
the filter diameter the more important the sealed edges are.

Ken Wilcox

At 9:26 -0500 7/2/1, a fine scholar, Tom.Henson@bakerbotts.com wrote:

>Good morning all.
>
>I am getting ready to go on vacation to sunny Palm Beach and Miami in a
>couple of weeks and have been trying to find a Heliopan Circular Polarizer
>filter for my R8 in size 60e.
>
>I find that the price of the Leica filter is just too high and thought I
>would be able to find a good quality alternative. I choose Heliopan first
>because I understand that they actually make the Leica filter, but have also
>searched the web for B&W in that size as well.
>
>I can not seem to find the Heliopan available in the 60e size. I have a
>feeling that Leica has some kind of agreement not to market this size in the
>US. I don't know it just seems very hard to find this size. I did manage to
>find one site that sells them but I don't know the difference between a
>regular circular polarizer and a Kasemann polarizer other than the Kasemann
>is a lot more expensive.
>
>I did search through the archives and found some information that seems to
>lead toward the Heliopan being the better since they use a slim mount vs.
>B&W. I do plan on using this filter on an 28-70 vario and an 80-200 vario. I
>am concerned about vignetting on the 28-70.
>
>I have found many sites that list the B&W brand in that size. Both in the
>regular and Kasemann.
>
>Question: anyone want to offer an opinion on the quality difference between
>the two? B&W seems to be less expensive. Should I go ahead and spend the
>extra money for the Kasemann? Especially if I plan on using it next to the
>ocean? Or, should I just breakdown and spend the money and buy the Leica and
>be done with it?
>
>Any help of this subject would be much appreciated and I thank all in
>advance for their advice and help.
>
>Tom Henson
>Houston


- ----
Ken Wilcox                                Carolyn's Personal Touch Portraits
					  preferred---> <wilcox@tir.com>
 		      			  <kwilcox@gfn.org>