Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree with you Pete. I use T400CN for the same reason in 35mm and 120. I really like the look of the finished images and I like using my JOBO for the C41 processing. Absolute consistency. Very fine grain. Huge dynamic range. Nothing is being wasted. The Leica/Hasselblad quality is preserved. Photographic quality is, as you say, a whole lot more than MTF curves or resolution numbers. Jim At 07:18 AM 6/26/01 -0700, Pete Su wrote: > > Mxsmanic wrote: > > >>> The fact that Tri-X Pan 400 is a very grainy film of fairly low > > resolution.<<<< > >I think the point that is often missed is that this "fact" has almost nothing >to do with whether you will get good pictures out of a Leica when you have >Tri-X loaded. > >I shoot almost 100% of my black and white on Tri-X in 35mm or 120 because I >like the look of the film and I like to be able to hand hold pictures most of >the time. > >The bottom line is, if you get a good photo, you are never "wasting" your >equipment. Resolution and sharpness, IMHO, is a relatively minor aspect of >picture "quality." > >Pete