Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Home depot and the rest
From: "Bryan Caldwell" <>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 18:58:32 -0700
References: <> <>


The local municipal code where I live criminalizes trespass as "loitering" -
remaining on private property without the owner's permission - still a
misdeanor. Perhaps I should have referred to "loitering" rather than

My apologies for having inspired such a dignified response.


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Marc James Small" <>
To: <>
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Home depot and the rest

> At 05:42 PM 6/21/01 -0700, Bryan Caldwell wrote:
> >It is difficult, however, to speak in general terms or cite
> >specific statutes, because criminal trespass is usually the subject of
> >ordinances, not state laws.
> Horse-patooties, sir.  In most US states, trespass is governed by state
> alone.  There may be exceptions, but these would be a strong minority, I
> suspect.
> The Dillon Rule still has SOME effect, thank heavens!
> Marc
>  FAX:  +540/343-7315
> Cha robh bąs fir gun ghrąs fir!

In reply to: Message from "Austin Franklin" <> (RE: [Leica] Home depot and the rest)
Message from Marc James Small <> (Re: [Leica] Home depot and the rest)