Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M vs R musing...
From: "Ken Iisaka" <ken@iisaka.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:52:27 -0700

After shedding of my Nikon SLR equipment, I've now been shooting with a SL2
MOT body for a few months now.

I was rather astonished to see that the success rate was a lot lower with
the SLR than my M.  The lenses that I used most are virtually identical: the
Canadian Summicron-M 50mm and the Canadian Summicron-R 50mm (II).  Under
microscope, it took no time to realise that I do not focus as accurately
with the R, and there is more blur from the mirror.

I suppose that these observations shouldn't be a surprise, but it reinforced
the notion to me that an SLR is a specialised equipment most suited for
macrophotography and telephotography, and for exact composition with a
tripod.

- -----
Ken Iisaka <first name at last name dot org>
Still lost in Mill Valley, Marin County, CA.

Replies: Reply from "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] M vs R musing...)