Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Michael, The TMax is supposed to get less grainy, sharper, and less tolerant of bad exposure. It appears that Tri-X is favored by some people because it is easier to handle in terms of exposure and development and has a nice tonality. Note: this is not personal experience, I do not use Kodak B&W films, but it seems to be the gist of many threads here over the past 3 years. Nathan "G. Michael Paine" wrote: > Would someone care to enlighten me as to the perceived differences > between Kodak TRI X and TMAX Professional 400. I have heard that the > latter is actually the finer grained of the two. > Michael - -- Nathan Wajsman Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch General photo site: http://belgiangator.tripod.com/ Belgium photo site: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman/ Motorcycle site: http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/1704/