Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/06/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] 80mm Summilux age (more ...)
From: "David Freedman" <dpfreedman@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 22:28:07 -0400
References: <B746E401.FEEB%john@pinkheadedbug.com> <200106090159.SAA18097@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
This list is *amazing* !! It took just minutes to get an answer. Actually,
multiple answers. Thank you all.
So, here's a follow-up question: Is there any reason not to buy an 18-year
old 80mm Summilux-R that appears to be in mint condition? Has the optical
formula changed in that time?
Let's see how long it takes to get an answer to this one. GO .....
Replies:
Reply from Andrew Schroter <schroter@optonline.net> (Re: [Leica] 80mm Summilux age (more ...))
Reply from Andrew Schroter <schroter@optonline.net> (Re: [Leica] 80mm Summilux age (more ...))
In reply to:
Message from Johnny Deadman <john@pinkheadedbug.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: a lunatic flash technique... try it.)
Message from "Richard W. Hemingway" <rheming@attglobal.net> (Re: [Leica] 80mm Summilux age ...)